Farley’s Question

Farly asked me a question: if in 2012 you began aging a normal human lifespan… what would you do?

At first it seemed a simple question to answer, but each time I set about formulating a reply I found myself unsure of the easy responses. So many things spilled forth without consideration, as if the sudden realization I had but seventy or so years remaining might somehow erase thirty-five centuries of experience. I suspect the certainty of mortality might change me though I have often purported no fear of my own death- it would be in understanding my time was now finite. Seventy years pass so quickly.

I thought I might marry and have children. There was a time when the desire for mate and family overwhelmed me, but that was long ago and the ages have driven that need from me. Those times I allowed myself to become as a mother to an adopted family did offer a richness and fulfillment of sorts, but they also saddled me with the inevitable grief of parting from those I allowed myself to care for. That pain was not solely my own, often settling upon those I was forced to abandon as the years closed in about us. I found myself wondering if I could bear to be parted from my own children, had I any. Could I be content to die and leave them, never knowing their fate? To know as I passed that their own grief would weigh upon them long after… I must admit the thought of such circumstance is not inconsequential to one who has been party to such events more times than she cares to recount. That this is the accepted fate of men and women throughout time does nothing to mitigate these reservations.

I would not have children. My desire for that lies far in the past and is best left there.

Farly suggested I might seek to record the events of my life, the lessons learned over long decades. I do that to a very small degree in this venue, but I wonder if there is any point to the attempt? In recent correspondence with Hrodgar I offered the following:

I once thought to be a teacher of men, to attempt in some way to share those things I have learned, but in short order it became clear men need to learn for themselves those lessons that define the limits and opportunities of civilization. I am but one voice toiling in anonymity. The lessons I offered were unwelcome and unheeded, perhaps even useless. I am too far removed from the rhythm of the lives of those who surround me, out of synch as it were. Your lives race forward at such a pace should I allow my attentions to wander but a little it seems the culture has warped nearly beyond recognition. I adapt out of habit, but it seems I learn nothing new. The mores shift, the slang changes, but in the end what was alien is revealed to be so very familiar.

I suspect I lack the proper mix of devotion and charisma to be an effective teacher of the human race. It bears too much resemblance to the toils of Sisyphus. I write my words and leave them here. Those who encounter them may make of them what they will.

I have no new adventures to explore beyond this somewhat self-destructive habit of revelation (Yes, Loren, I am mindful of your admonitions- forgive my unwillingness to heed them). Were the yoke of immortality lifted from my shoulders I do believe I would set my affairs in order then find a place both peaceful and beautiful to await my end.

That notion suits me best.

Thanksgiving

There are many things I am grateful for, but I give true thanks for this.

Lessons Apparently Not Learned

Contrary to popular perception, it seems that history rarely repeats itself. Yet humans do repeat the same mistakes.

I thought you Americans might have learned an important lesson from the aftermath of your shameless abandonment of the South Vietnamese people in the 1970’s. From the looks of things in the media and in particular this comment I ran across while perusing my regular reads, it appears that lesson did not take.

Finish what you started, America, or 2000 dead will just be the down payment on the butcher’s bill.

Gabrielle Francesca East

Now for something a little different: I admit to having developed… not quite an obsession, but rather an intimate appreciation for a story very long in the telling about a certain red-headed character with whom I am certain I could lay waste to a perfectly respectable case of Scotch Whiskey. Her name is Gabrielle Francesca East, but she is most definitely Dolly, and her tale begins here.

What has consumed my time this past year

Just under a year ago, driven by events beyond my control, I took a man into my confidence. This is just a taste of what may come.
Read more…

Open Thread

I generally close comments on posts after a week or two, but in this case, comments shall remain open indefinitely. Consider this the proper place to offer comments or questions on old posts. I shall place it in the sidebar for easy access.

Questions

Adam-

It saddens me when deep questions are tossed about in the manner of base conversation. Do not take this to mean I think less of you; no, rather I consider you to be more than your manner might lead some to believe. Do consider framing your inquiries more formally for the practice would serve you well in life.

You asked for proof. I offer none. Your belief or disbelief is your own affair, immaterial to me. Take what you wish form these words, or leave them unread if you prefer.

On to the assorted topics raised by you and others.

I have written more than once on the topics of Good, Evil, Faith and Man so I shall not recapitulate those writings here. As to your hypotheticals, I fail to see what relevance they have to the question of faith. A world populated by human beings is a world prone to the faults and failings of the creatures there dwelling. The notion one could create a society where all are unassailably Good bears a striking resemblance to the fantasy world of “pure communism” I touched upon before- it cannot exist and is therefore useless as a point of argument.

As for definitions- my own are quite mundane: Evil is that which impedes humanity first, and that which harms individuals second. Good is that which stands in opposition to Evil. Evil attempts to present itself as Good- it is the art of rationalization. Good always recognizes Evil- it may be forced to accept it, but it never attempts to call Evil by any other name. Note that the Good can manifest evil actions, but Evil never manifests good actions, for actions in the service of evil are evil in and of themselves. Rooted in the sickness, they are the sickness. In the simplest possible terms, Evil is the essence of narcissism- self-serving above all other things.

Faith takes many forms, a majority of which bear no resemblance to what most call religion. One has faith in her friends, in the society surrounding her, the civilization within which she exists- indeed such faith is an absolute necessity in the assorted formulae of civilization. Religious faith, whether we choose to believe or not, is an aspect of this, but not the only one. With this in mind I submit if you are an American it is nearly impossible to ignore the impact of religious faith on your world view and behavior. You may not believe, but the aspects of religious faith within which your culture is steeped make their mark upon you nonetheless.

You touch upon the crux of all life’s struggles when you ask are contradictions necessary to life. Must there be both good and evil? Must there be conflict and pressure? I can only reply this is the way of the world. Man faces conflict and contradiction because conflict and contradiction serve to define Man. It is in his dealing with such forces that the individual, and through him society, is brought to the fullest possible potential. This is an ancient theme in philosophy for very good reason- it is undeniably true

You enquire as to my whereabouts as Christianity burst upon the western world. I was meandering about the western reaches of the Roman Empire, my center being what is called Lyon today. My very first encounter with that faith was recently recounted in these pages, though I knew nothing of what I had encountered at that time. As such, there was no great revelation experienced- the Christians were little more than another odd sect Jews. Did Christianity intrigue me? Christ offered his followers eternal life- how could I fail to take an intense interest in that? Even after I understood this immortality required first death I remained fascinated, but I never truly believed. I was then and remain today a spiritual child of pagan and animist roots. Still, early Christians offered me succor, though none ever knew my true nature, and I spent many decades in their embrace. They have influenced me, mostly in positive ways.

On the subject of the religious underpinnings of an understanding of good and evil, I am afraid I cannot be dispositive. My own understanding is built upon a framework of centuries of experiences while you are forced to absorb your teachings and frame your beliefs in a handful of decades. I know what I know, but I cannot know for you. This is part of the conflict and contradiction that drives mankind as a race- that each generation is forced to relearn what has been learned before. Challenging old beliefs is as old as Man himself and your very civilization is built upon the wreckage of those conflicts, all those hard-won lessons bought with coin of blood and suffering.

In regards to slavery my attitudes towards it have taken a slow turn for in my youth (for lack of a better term) it was an accepted institution and unremarkable for all that. Slaves filled an important niche in society and were generally valued assets rather than mere receptacles for abuse. Even such as me, often nothing more than a toy, still possessed value for the functions I served. I believe my distaste for the institution arose from the confluence of two forces: the moral educational precepts of monotheistic Judeo-Christian teachings with their roots in Hellenistic philosophies, and the technological progress of Man himself. One teaches all persons are possessed of a unique and irreplaceable aspect; the other simply erased any economic justification for the practice. By the time the Americans fought their great struggle for the soul and unity of their nation I could not accept that chattel slavery could be justified in any form; at least, not in this modern world.

My dislike for Marxism and Socialism are rooted in the destruction they have wrought sans any tangible benefit to the world. They are rooted in poison, and thus are poison regardless of the noble purposes they claim. That they render their subjects slaves to the state is just another indictment against them, not the only one.

Conversations With Hrodgar, Part 2

More of the correspondence between Hrodgar and myself…
Read more…

Communism

I nearly chose not to post this as it is purely political in nature and rather uncharacteristically strident. It springs from an on again, off again correspondence with what I have concluded is a nineteen or twenty year old perpetually outraged college student. It took some time for him to pique my ire, but credit where credit is due, he finally succeeded. What follows is my final response to him- I place it in the extended entry for the benefit of those who wisely choose to ignore such things.
Read more…

Conversations With Hrodgar, Part One

9 September of 2005

Zsallia

Thanks for taking the time to reply to my comments. When I first started reading your blog I was struck by your eloquence and how your past comes to life through people. Like many I wondered if you were a figment of some brilliant writer’s imagination. This no longer seems important, you are a real person with amazing stories to tell. Who you are seems less important than what you share with us.

We are all different. I was born with a gift to learn and understand how things work. Our bodies mechanisms of aging and healing are things no one fully comprehends, but some of the complexities are apparent. How you came to be is a puzzle and probably will stay so but your existence is both plausible and partially explicable from a scientific viewpoint. Evolution requires aging and death, Life itself has no such imperative. Your DNA is a little different, still human but with enough elegant changes that deliberate design rather than random mutation seems a certainty. You were made with purpose and your creation involved not a little effort and a thousand times more knowledge of our genetic code than we now possess. Whatever the purpose in your being I am glad of your existence and willingness to write.

I have always been driven by a hunger to learn and many times found what seems at first unknowable gradually becomes seen, first as ghosts and echos, visions, stories and dreams and then finally takes form and substance for me. My desire to meet you is strong, perhaps irrationally so. To know someone who has seen the beauty and futility, the cycles long and short with clear eyes and not held back through fear from truly living despite the certain knowledge of separation and loss. Perhaps to argue and debate, share the precious and puzzling, talk of things few know or even dare to think.

Happily, I have a family I love. As you are the very image of that which would tempt me most there is also the fear of losing myself and them. Although more through circumstances than will I have never consummated the desire to be with anyone but my wife, the incredible tide that swept me, head buzzing with desire for another, reason abandoned is still fresh in my mind after many years. I am however no Tom Cruise. My purpose for saying these things is to be honest and not hide myself or my fears however foolish or unlikely.

I have little to offer except my time and whatever I know that you do not. I can do one thing that is to my knowledge unique. My mind is driven by those I am with and changes in ways I do not understand when I engage. I have searched all my life for someone who could head to head equal me but have been left disappointed. Alone I am myself but come alive as if transformed and seem to know and see through many others eyes when challenged by another. This has in a strange way made me jaded and dissatisfied. Why was I made with a mind that excels most when brought alive by another’s brilliance. The connection seems strange in that once made they become part of my way of seeing the world as if their understanding somehow imprints on mine. I believe if we were to meet the result would be a new understanding for both of us and although I don’t know why I say it a resolution of some things we neither understood before.

I do not fully understand why I am writing this, The impracticality of what I am suggesting is breathtaking and I expect nothing more than a polite explanation of why it is impossible. Or even silence, but in some strange sense there is some purpose in this which will unfold in time.

Regards

Hrodgar

11 September of 2005

Hrodgar,

?Tis an odd world in which we dwell, is it not?

I have been approached before as a result of my journal, in some cases the method and persistence of such attentions became problematic and played no small part in my decision to abandon my efforts in December of 2003. This is not to say I am unwilling to converse, rather it is an admonishment to keep one’s credulous tendencies firmly in check. Regardless of who or what I might be there is much to recommend drawing a fine, bright line between what is true and what one wishes to believe.

Zsallia