The Yeti Offers His Thoughts
The Yeti writes, offering the following theories and speculations. The links are my own, just to provide some background. I have comments to make; however, I will offer them seperately.
Man’s ancestor apes are now placed at a staggering 25 million years ago. Hominids appeared about 14 million years ago. 3 million years created the first Homo species, followed by Australopithecus. 1,000,000 years later, we have the first evidence of Homo Erectus. And finally, after another 900,000 years, primitive man, known as Neanderthal. The difference between Australopithecus and Neanderthal is noticeable only in evolutionary terms. They used the same crude stone tools, and had no civilization that we would recognize.
Suddenly, Cro-Magnon man appeared 35,000 years ago. Discoveries in the last two decades have shown that Cro-Magnon is a different offshoot than Neanderthal. Originally, it was thought that Cro-Magnon was our progenitor. Now we know that there truly is a missing link.
And then suddenly, civilization appears in Sumer. I’ve been reading a lot of my old texts and some of the new articles out. There’s a lot of study that simply does not make sense – and can’t be fit into the accepted view of civilization. So why did I bring this up.
Because the accepted views of mankind’s origins are not complete. And you maintain that you truly do live a different life than any we’ve heard of.
If what you say is true, perhaps so is some of the research done by Sichin and Velikovsky and Fromm.
Allow me to throw something out there. Ralph Solecki had evidence that man had actually entered a regressive period through time. Then, inexplicably, “thinking man”, Homo sapiens sapiens appears, with a high level of cultural sophistication in relation to what had been a regressive culture. Almost as if man had received a boost.
Do these names sound familiar? Anu, Enki, Enlil, Ninlil, Ea and Ishkur. They’re the name of Sumerian Gods. They also have a significant role in what I’m going to suggest.
The theory is that real live aliens came down and utilized prehistoric man as labor to mine metals. They used their knowledge of genetics to create “man” in their own image, using the “clay” of prehistoric man.
This would explain the regression of man, as different types of men would procreate like animals, and be abandoned by their creators.
Enki was the God if the Underworld, and it seems he was in Africa working the mines, away from the original landing places in Mesopotamia.
We know that every culture has Gods and Kings, and all of the ancient literature, from the Iliad, to the Egyptians, to the Bible, to the epic of Gilgamesh to the Indonesian legends all talk of Gods intermarrying the females of man.
Even in Genesis, the sons of Adam left the Garden and went out to procreate with men.
Anyway – that’s a lot of information. But the specific understanding, is that Enki was the great protector of man. And also responsible for disobeying Enlil, giving man the secrets of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, which were assumed to be increased intelligence and the power to procreate.
Some texts, including that of Berossus, talk of genetic manipulation that included men with two heads, with animal parts, and also, something that we could easily describe as cherubim and seraphim. Manlike creatures, created to serve the Gods, without the power of reproduction, but with other skills according to their need. Say, recreation and a gene that prevents the aging gene from turning on and destroying cells?
Sumerian texts describe men created by Enki and Ninhursag (a type of Female mother Goddess), including one that could not hold back his urine, a woman who could not give birth, and four others, including those who were old too soon, and another with neither male or female organs.
The animals did not work well, but perhaps this explains the artwork and statuary of the time. The Gods realized that they had to mix the ape-men of the time with their own genetic material. And this was Homo-Sapiens created – millions of years ahead of when evolution would allow them to, and without branches leading from Homo Erectus to Homo sapiens.
Straight forward readings of the Bible, the Greek legends and the Egyptian ones actually make sense. It’s only when we claim that they had to be myths and legends that they suddenly become convoluted and no longer fit the historical record.
Knowing that this is possible, or probable, or at least no more strange than a woman who claims she is 3500 years old – could it be that you are literally a creation of the same gods that created man, made in their image (God always seems to speak in plural), but bred for a different purpose? The Nefilim, which is the name Sitchin gives them, return every 3600 years, based on the non-elliptical orbit of the Twelfth Planet. In the last six months, we have confirmed the existence of a large body in an non-elliptical orbit that affects Uranus, Neptune and Pluto.
Now – obviously this is pretty far out. And it is not “accepted.”
Then again, how would the human race react to finding out we domesticated pets and workers? How would this affect our religion, and our government?
This is the information that is supposed to reside in the secret societies of the Masons.
Interesting, No?
Try finding a copy of the Twelfth Planet, by Zecharii Sitchin. Then look into studies of current astronomy on Planet X, theorized in the 1980’s, and recently in the news.
Fascinating. I eagerly await a reply.
Posted on August 24th, 2003 by Zsallia
Filed under: Immortality, Philosophy, The Past
I hope this comes across correctly. Alternative history is always hard to explain.
The genetic inheritance you possess could have a very clear explanation.
Your lack of memory and “mental dullness” for the first art of your remembered existence could have been your body recovering from major trauma. Say, drowning during the Flood?
It could be that you truly are Methuselah’s daughter.
Perhaps you fail to understand:
I DO NOT WANT TO BE SO ANCIENT
I fear such things. I want to be human.
I want to be able to love, and cherish, and die. Just as you can.
Sometimes, quite often actually, I truly hate what I am.
As does everyone.
And yet what can you change?
If you have served no purpose, what purpose can you wring from the universe at large?
You know you have the capacity to die, and yet you have never availed yourself of that course.
You say you often hate what you are?
That is human.
What I wouldn’t give to trade places with you – knowing that mortal life is altogther too short.
It’s really quite unfortunate you have a need for security. I bet you’re great for late night drunken conversations.
The above comments were first posted on 08/25/2003 prior to being re-posted here today.